Last Friday I was ensnared in an MRC boat inspection
operation by the MRC police. This felt like a “Just for Laughs Gag” because I was going out to see the police to complain about a large and fast motor boat
that had just swamped my canoe beside my dock. That boat
breezed by the police boat without being stopped. Before I could get their
attention, they nabbed me and held onto me for over an hour as I was grilled
and pulled downstream for over a kilometer. When I asked them to tow me back to
where they picked me up because I was worried about heat stroke, they just
laughed and handed me a whopping ticket.
The MRC police website indicates that on Friday they
intercepted 13 boaters. 12 warnings were issued and only two tickets were
issued – apart from their bad math, I was one of two who received a maximum
fine of $267 for failing to have all the safety equipment on board. The same press release urges boaters to check
out a Transport Canada website which I could not find the relevant laws for
human powered water craft. Believe me I tried, the only people who seem to know
are motor boaters who pass a test and are given a pamphlet that states this
information. This is why a warning from police is reasonable and fair. I have
since spoken with other canoeists and kayakers who were pulled over the police
and they told me they were issued a warning, despite missing more equipment
than I was. Currently being underemployed, I couldn’t afford to pay this fine even
if I had the money.
After 25 years of living on the river, I have never had an
encounter with the MRC boat police and never seen anything to suggest I was
breaking the law. There is no test for human powered water craft, no
information on the MRC website, how is one to know? All is required is to miss
out on one of the five stickler requirements that does not differ much between
a 40 foot monster motor boat and a flat board. For example I had my life jacket
in the canoe, I have a tied on floatation device, I had rope on both ends of
the canoe (they did not measure what I had but simply said it was not the
minimum 50 feet), I even had an extra paddle. I had a waterproof Tilley hat to
use as a baler and I demonstrated my loud whistle with my mouth, these were not
allowable. Where is their sense of humor! The last thing really blew my mind was
that I needed to have a flashlight in the middle of the day to alert people on
the shore if I was in trouble. I was told by Mr. Fournel that the full list of mandatory
safety equipment is available on the MRC FaceBook site (which I don’t subscribe
to), so I would encourage all recreational river users to become familiar with
this list to avoid the cash-grab situation I fell into last Friday with the MRC
police.
I would appreciate any readers sharing their stories with me
if they have had a similar experience. This might help me to beat this ticket
in court. In the meantime, at the very least, I hope this message helps other
soft recreational boaters to avoid this water trap.
Happy safe boating!
No comments:
Post a Comment