IT IS QUITE CLEAR TO ANYONE FOUR LANE HIGHWAYS ARE SAFER ...CHECK OUT THE AMOUNT OF DEATHS AND ACCIDENTS ON HIGHWAY 5 COMPARE IT TO 105 . May be you should try joining the flat earth society they might listen to your warped logic.Two people got killed on the 105 2 weeks ago why not do some research your self and find 1 death on highway 5 . Your group could not even sit in a tree without calling in the ambulance to save you ....
Twinning of the 101 in Nova Scotia has been a hot topic for a number of years also. Safety is often cited as a number one concern for proponents of the twinning. In this report they talk about accident statistics using a measurement of number of accidents per hundred-million vehicle kilometres. According to this paper, the transition from a single lane head-on highway (such as the current 105 and which is a class 5 highway in Nova Scotia) to a twin lane divided highway (such as the current 5 and which is a class 1 in Nova Scotia) reduces the accident rate by 46% from 72.3 accidents per hundred million vehicle kilometres on a class 5 highway to 33.2 per hundred million vehicle kilometres on a class 1 highway. This statistic is apparently substantiated by another paper called Final Report Environmental Assessment Screening Report The Twinning of Highway 101 … that notes the effects of reducing / increasing the speed limits have on fatalities. Another important observation is the environmental implications as a result of higher speed limits which results in lower fuel economy and higher tail pipe emissions. I would be willing to bet that Transport Quebec likely has similiar kinds of statistics available for Quebec roads and highways and would be interested what their numbers indicate. For your consideration.